Posts Tagged ‘ Prolapse ’

Dr. Twiss Part II: On the Basics of Medicine and Biocompatible Materials for Transvaginal Mesh

Oct 30th, 2013 | By
Dr. Twiss Part II: On the Basics of Medicine and Biocompatible Materials for Transvaginal Mesh

Christian Twiss, MD  is a surgeon at the University of Arizona’s Department of Surgery, division of urology. He is a Board Certified urologist by training with a subspecialty and certification in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS). Dr. Twiss studied with Dr. Shlomo Raz at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) between 2006-2008.
[continue reading...]



Dr. Twiss On Transvaginal Mesh, Removals, Concerns and Consent

Oct 28th, 2013 | By
Dr. Twiss On Transvaginal Mesh, Removals, Concerns and Consent

Christian Twiss, MD  is a surgeon at the University of Arizona’s Department of Surgery, division of urology. He is a Board Certified urologist by training with a sub-specialty and certification in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS). Dr. Twiss studied with Dr. Shlomo Raz at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) between 2006-2008.
[continue reading...]



Breaking News! AMS Alleges “Scheme” to Profit from Transvaginal Mesh Injuries

Oct 10th, 2013 | By
Breaking News! AMS Alleges “Scheme” to Profit from Transvaginal Mesh Injuries

A Mesh News Desk Exclusive ~ A hearing in federal court in West Virginia, Thursday, will determine whether American Medical Systems (AMS) can pursue allegations of what it calls a “scheme” to create fraudulent transvaginal mesh removal records for profit and to stack the deck against the mesh maker in ongoing federal litigation. The mesh
[continue reading...]



Jury Seated in C.R. Bard Federal Transvaginal Mesh Trial

Jul 8th, 2013 | By
Jury Seated in C.R. Bard Federal Transvaginal Mesh Trial

July 8, 2013~ Telling the courtroom that California would take three weeks to seat a jury, West Virginia U.S. District Court Judge Joseph R. Goodwin had a jury selected in just two hours in the first federal case naming a manufacturer of transvaginal mesh. C.R. Bard, maker of Avaulta meshes, is named as a defendant
[continue reading...]



Op-Ed: Dr. Shezad Malik on Doctors and Transvaginal Mesh

Jul 2nd, 2013 | By
Op-Ed: Dr. Shezad Malik on Doctors and Transvaginal Mesh

Op-Ed: Dr Shezad Malik Law Firm http://www.shezadmalik.com/ Dr. Malik is a cardiologist and now an attorney in Dallas who heads his own law firm. He is board certified in internal medicine and was a practicing cardiologist for 10 years. In 2003 he decided to go to law school and has been practicing personal injury law
[continue reading...]



Happy Anniversary Food and Drug Administration – Now What?

Jul 2nd, 2013 | By
Happy Anniversary Food and Drug Administration – Now What?

July 2, 2013 ~ Many of you may be aware that the entire pursuit of lawsuits against mesh manufacturers began two years ago this month with the issuance of a safety warning from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration concerning transvaginal mesh. FDA Safety Communication: UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical
[continue reading...]



The Links Between Surgical Mesh Complications and the Development of Autoimmune Diseases

May 7th, 2013 | By
The Links Between Surgical Mesh Complications and the Development of Autoimmune Diseases

Greetings from Nonie Wideman, a survivor of medical complications from Foreign Body Response (FBR) to synthetic medical mesh. I have spent over 15 years advocating for children and families, over twelve of them as a specialized care provider teaching coping and life skills.  I had to put into practice myself what I taught after a
[continue reading...]



Gross v. Johnson & Johnson – The Post-Trial Process

Mar 22nd, 2013 | By
Gross v. Johnson & Johnson – The Post-Trial Process

March 22, 2013 ~ by ADAM SLATER   Mr. Slater of Mazie, Slater Katz & Freeman LLC of Roseland, New Jersey recently represented plaintiff Linda Gross in her product liability lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson over its Prolift surgical mesh used to treat prolapse.  She was awarded  $3.35 in compensatory damages and $7.76 million in
[continue reading...]



Day 26: Linda Gross v. Ethicon Jury Asks for Ms. Gross Testimony from Trial

Feb 21st, 2013 | By
Day 26: Linda Gross v. Ethicon  Jury Asks for Ms. Gross Testimony from Trial

Thanks again to Courtroom View Network for access to this trial! February 21, 2013 ~ On this Day 26 of the Linda Gross v. Ethicon trial, the jury took this second full day of deliberations to ask the court to re-read Ms. Gross’s testimony from her court appearance. The jury received the case after closing
[continue reading...]



Day 15: Linda Gross v. Ethicon, Scientist Dismissive Over Transvaginal Mesh Complications

Feb 1st, 2013 | By
Day 15: Linda Gross v. Ethicon, Scientist Dismissive Over Transvaginal Mesh Complications

  February 1, 2013~ As the plaintiff’s case wraps up in the Linda Gross v. Ethicon trial, the deposition of the Medical Affairs Director of Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson) Europe appeared to jurors via his taped deposition. Dr. Axel Arnaud seemed dismissive of the questions asked by plaintiff attorney Adam Slater. At times his thick
[continue reading...]



We hope you find this a helpful resource. National News Editor, Jane Akre, began MDND with the hope of providing the latest news, information and perspective from the regulatory, industry and patient point of view, something that goes under-reported in much of the coverage of medical devices. The public is just now becoming aware that many devices do not undergo the same scrutiny as prescription drugs and are instead grandfathered in under an FDA loophole that has gone largely unchanged since the 1970s. As a result, patients become the post-market clinical trial subjects, and many suffer devastating and permanent injuries.