Posts Tagged ‘ Institute of Medicine ’

Most High-Risk Heart Devices Approved With No Tests

Nov 25th, 2012 | By
Most High-Risk Heart Devices Approved With No Tests

November 24, 2012 ~  Most readers of Mesh Medical Device News Desk are familiar with the ease with which surgical mesh and other medical devices make it to the market. An exchange of paperwork and a claim of ‘substantial equivalence’ to another device already being sold, and a manufacturer can launch his product- even a
[continue reading...]



FDA Follows Industry Lead to Shorten Time to Market

Oct 31st, 2012 | By
FDA Follows Industry Lead to Shorten Time to Market

October 30, 2012 ~    The FDA has issued the new rules for medical device makers to speed up the time it takes for medical devices to make it to market. Earlier this year industry agreed to pay $595 million over 5 years to the FDA as part of its operating budget. In exchange, the
[continue reading...]



Reporters Resource on Covering Mesh Issues

Aug 31st, 2012 | By
Reporters Resource on Covering Mesh Issues

Mesh 101: The Basics For reporters looking for a way to get started on the transvaginal mesh story, here are some highlights to shortcut your research. This is not a lawyer-generated story!  There are real women suffering devastating injuries from the use of plastic mesh and it continues today!   “We were very shocked and
[continue reading...]



Patient Advocate Joleen Chambers Needs Your Vote!

Jul 17th, 2012 | By
Patient Advocate Joleen Chambers Needs Your Vote!

Texas-based patient advocate, Joleen Chambers heads FIDA, FAILED Implant Device Alliance, their website is here. Chambers is interested in winning a Mayo Clinic Center for Social Media Scholarship (more here). She needs daily votes! All you have to do is add a Facebook Like or Twitter Tweet button at the bottom of each post to
[continue reading...]



ProPublia: Four Medical Devices that Bypassed FDA Scrutiny

May 10th, 2012 | By
ProPublia: Four Medical Devices that Bypassed FDA Scrutiny

May 10, 2012 ~ ProPublica, an independent journalism organization, reports on four medical devices that are among the thousands pushed into the marketplace every year that do not undergo Food and Drug Administration (FDA) scrutiny. The bottom line – medical devices are big business bringing over $100 billion-a-year to the industry, giving industry the muscle
[continue reading...]



Consumer Reports Campaign email Alerts Million About Defective Medical Devices

Mar 13th, 2012 | By
Consumer Reports Campaign email Alerts Million About Defective Medical Devices

MARCH 12, 2012 ~ How bad are medical devices approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration? Reuters reports (here) that Consumer Reports believes they are very bad. The president of the 76-year-old publication wrote in an email to 1 million subscribers this year that, “The implant that fixed your knee or your heart may
[continue reading...]



FDA Denies Legal Group Seeking to Ban IOM Recommendations

Mar 8th, 2012 | By
FDA Denies Legal Group Seeking to Ban IOM Recommendations

March 7, 2012 ~ Bloomberg BNA reported (here) that the Washington Legal Foundation (WLF), had its petition rejected by the Food and Drug Administration February 21 after the industry-tied group tried to have the recommendation of an expert scientific panel barred from FDA consideration and implementation. The WLF is made up of corporate inside-the-beltway attorneys
[continue reading...]



Medical Device Makers Will Double Fees for Faster FDA Reviews

Feb 1st, 2012 | By
Medical Device Makers Will Double Fees for Faster FDA Reviews

Medical device makers want to get their products into the marketplace faster. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) needs more operating capital to review medical devices. The two have formed an informal agreement that was leaked to Bloomberg on Wednesday, February 1 (here). Under the proposed plan, medical device makers would pay $595 million
[continue reading...]



New England Journal of Medicine – Medical Devices – Balancing Regulation and Innovation

Jan 19th, 2012 | By
New England Journal of Medicine – Medical Devices – Balancing Regulation and Innovation

January 19, 2012 ~ In a letter to the Editor of the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), (here) January 19, 2012, Neil Feder, M.D. of the Project on Government Oversight writes about the 510(k) process that allows untested medical devices onto the market without premarket approval. Share this:



More Monitoring of Medical Device Implants After Market

Dec 18th, 2011 | By
More Monitoring of Medical Device Implants After Market

Artificial hips that fail, surgical mesh that injures – the New York Times reports (here) on December 14, 2011, that amid the growing number of problems with medical devices a bipartisan bill was introduced in the U.S. Senate that would require device makers follow the life of their products after they’re approved for sale. Share
[continue reading...]



We hope you find this a helpful resource. National News Editor, Jane Akre, began MDND with the hope of providing the latest news, information and perspective from the regulatory, industry and patient point of view, something that goes under-reported in much of the coverage of medical devices. The public is just now becoming aware that many devices do not undergo the same scrutiny as prescription drugs and are instead grandfathered in under an FDA loophole that has gone largely unchanged since the 1970s. As a result, patients become the post-market clinical trial subjects, and many suffer devastating and permanent injuries.