Suffering in Silence: Jane Dowdall – Life After Prolapse Bladder Surgery with Synthetic Mesh

Oct 31st, 2011 | By | Category: Patient Profiles

Jane Dowdall

Jane Dowdall, 55,  is from  Ontario, Canada and tells her own story of bladder prolapse repair and her life today.

“In early 2009, I was referred to an Ob-Gyn for a bladder prolapse repair. During my pre-op appointment he explained that he would be using stitches for the repair, but since there was a good chance that following this surgery I may experience increased incontinence, I may want to also have a procedure that looked after that at the same time. Since I did have minor SUI (stress urinary incontinence) prior to the surgery, I agreed to the additional procedure.

“The Ob-Gyn sent me to a colleague who would perform the incontinence prevention part of the surgery. At my pre-op appointment with this Ob-Gyn, he quickly stated that I would be having a TVT-O but said nothing about possible risks or side effects. After leaving the appointment, I checked the Internet for more information on this procedure, but there was little available. Had I known then what I know now, I would have NEVER agreed to this procedure.”

Two Doctors?

“The next time I saw both doctors was in the O.R. on May 15, 2009. It did seem rather strange having two Ob-Gyns in the O.R., and I often wonder if one was learning from the other.

“Immediately after surgery I was experiencing pain and had difficulty urinating but attributed this to post-op symptoms. However, during the next couple of months the pain and urinary retention worsened. The pain radiated from my upper thighs to my navel, feeling much like a migraine headache, along with a burning and stinging sensation. Sitting, especially at my computer at work, was becoming unbearable.”

Out of Her Mind with Pain

“I visited the first Ob-Gyn and he ordered a pelvic ultra sound that indicated I had 63% bladder retention. He said the symptoms I was experiencing were not from ‘his part’ of the surgery and referred me back to the Ob-Gyn that performed the TVT-O.

“When I finally got an appointment in September, the TVT-O Ob-Gyn said he had not come across any problems with this procedure in the past, but would ask a colleague what it might be and that perhaps it was too tight. In the meantime he ordered another pelvic ultrasound. At my next appointment in October, he said I had an acceptable level of 20% urine retention, even though I was still having trouble urinating. He was still very puzzled by the pain I was experiencing and prescribed Celebrex and sent me on my way.”

Body Rejecting TVT-O

“Unable to work a full day due to extreme pain, I visited my family doctor who prescribed narcotic pain medication and referred me to a local Urologist. After a cystocopy that did not reveal erosion of the TVT tape or bladder tears, he felt my symptoms were consistent with TVT mesh rejection. He stated this was very rare and that he could not remove the mesh at this point. I was devastated!

“It wasn’t until I stumbled upon a newspaper article on the Internet from the Hamilton Spectator about a woman experiencing identical symptoms as my own, that I realized I was not the only one with an adverse reaction to this surgical mesh. Obtaining my hospital records, I discovered I had had the Johnson & Johnson Ethicon Gynecare TVT-O made of Prolene Polypropylene.

“By January 2010, the Tramadol and Tylenol 3 could no longer control the pain and I was unable to work. Other ‘nerve’ drugs were tried but I could not tolerate them. The local Urologist found a Urologist in Toronto who had experience in mesh removal and I was given a referral.”

Dr. L. Carr in Toronto

“In July, 2010 I had an appointment with Dr. L. Carr in Toronto, a very caring doctor who is extremely sympathetic to mesh issues. She said that only the center section of the tape could be safely removed due to the manner in which TVT-O is anchored and that there may be a reduction in pain but there was no guarantee. I appreciated her honesty. Feeling it was better to have the majority of the mesh removed to decrease chances of future erosion, I had removal surgery in August 2011. There were two other mesh removal surgeries that day, one lady traveling all the way from British Columbia.

“I am now able to urinate normally but have not had a decrease in pain. I am experiencing new stinging sensations that apparently could be caused by the ‘arms’ or ends of the mesh rubbing on surrounding tissue.”

Health Canada Warning

“What angers me is that I spoke with a nurse who just had the TVT-O procedure by the same Ob-Gyn that performed by my surgery, and when she inquired about possible risks or side effects, she was told there may be some post operative discomfort but no risks/side effects that he was aware of, even though on February 4, 2010, Health Canada issued a bulletin, (see here) similar to the FDA’s bulletin, warning of complications associated with transvaginal mesh. She is now experiencing problems similar to mine.

“It has now been almost two and a half years since the initial TVT-O surgery.  I am in constant pain and unable to work. I have been on Long Term Disability for over a year. In order to get through the day I must take narcotic drugs.  I spend most of my time in a reclining position, in loose fitting clothing, and I seldom leave the house.  I have filed a report to Health Canada without results.”

 

 

 

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

11 Comments to “Suffering in Silence: Jane Dowdall – Life After Prolapse Bladder Surgery with Synthetic Mesh”

  1. Paula C. says:

    Does anyone know a Canadian Law firm that is taking on these cases??

    Any help would be appreciated.

    Thank you

    Paula C.

  2. Kathleen says:

    Jane

    I was the person whom the Spec article is about. I am glad that the article helped you. I am still in constant and un-ending pain. I was wondering if you can contact me since my lawyer said that he got an expert medical opinion and that DR felt that I have NO grounds for a case since I had the TVT-O which he said is not included in the warning- and I am just a rare person who is having issues. May I ask who you got as your expert medical opinion so I can try again. I don’t want to pay to have another opinion but I don’t want to drop the case either. Can you help me Jane?
    Kathleen.

  3. Trilla says:

    I had the bladder mesh surgery in oct of 2011, I seem to want to urinate when i lay down at night,and i have a sensation to go and very little comes out, i didnt know this was a bad thing until after this was done and saw commercials on tv! Worried at ky.

  4. vicky bolton says:

    im 61 I had the mess put in in 2007 what do I do now can I safely have the mess taken out in Kamloops, B.C.
    or do I need to go somewhere where they have done this and are truly skilled Im in so much pain the burning
    is insane ive tied everything n o soap, no sex no sense left im on automatic pilot

    thankyou soo much for this site Vicky Bolton

  5. C Tanner says:

    Thank you for this very informative website. It seems that even if risk of complication is indeed ‘rare’ (from the evidence, this seems arguable), the difficulty in reversing the complication means that all patients need to be adequately informed about the risks before undergoing such surgery. The information on your site has led us to issue warnings on our Prolapse Surgery (http://prolapsesurgery.com) patient information site.

    • meshcomplicationssurvivor says:

      Thank goodness people are finally starting to listen and get the word out about these complications!

Leave a Comment

We hope you find this a helpful resource. National News Editor, Jane Akre, began MDND with the hope of providing the latest news, information and perspective from the regulatory, industry and patient point of view, something that goes under-reported in much of the coverage of medical devices. The public is just now becoming aware that many devices do not undergo the same scrutiny as prescription drugs and are instead grandfathered in under an FDA loophole that has gone largely unchanged since the 1970s. As a result, patients become the post-market clinical trial subjects, and many suffer devastating and permanent injuries.