FDA

Want to Reclassify a Medical Device? The FDA is all Ears

Nov 15th, 2011 | By
Want to Reclassify a Medical Device? The FDA is all Ears

The Food and Drug Administration on Monday, November 14, announced it will receive public comment on whether or not a medical device should be reclassified to require more or less regulatory oversight. Share this:



FDA: Medical Device Complications Growing Faster than Industry

Nov 8th, 2011 | By
FDA: Medical Device Complications Growing Faster than Industry

Understanding Barriers to Medical Device Quality is the name of an FDA report issued October 31 by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in an attempt to get a handle on why the medical device industry is putting out poorly made, defective medical devices that are
[continue reading...]



WHO ATTENDED: September 8-9 FDA Public/ Expert Meeting on Medical Devices for Obstetrics and Gynecology

Oct 4th, 2011 | By
WHO ATTENDED: September 8-9 FDA Public/ Expert Meeting on Medical Devices for Obstetrics and Gynecology

Synthetic surgical mesh has been on the hot seat of late after a July 13 FDA Safety Communication said that complications are “not rare,” a reversal from an October 2008 Public Health Notification which downplayed side effects as “rare”occurrences. Share this:



How to Speed Up Approval of Medical Devices?

Oct 4th, 2011 | By
How to Speed Up Approval of Medical Devices?

OCTOBER 3, 2011 -  How to speed up the approval of a medical device that cannot claim it is substantially similar to one already on the market under 510(k)? On Friday, September 30, the Food and Drug Administration released a long-awaited proposed revision to the 510(k) clearance process that could speed up product reviews by
[continue reading...]



Is the FDA Killing Innovation? Fortune, September 2, 2011

Sep 3rd, 2011 | By

CNN reports on MelaFind, a handheld medical device that helps doctors spot melanoma using a noninvasive computer imaging.  But it is still not approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and may not be.  The agency refused to take the next step to approval in 2009, even though the machine was on the fast-track. Uncertainty
[continue reading...]



LATEST FDA REPORT: Classify Surgical Mesh Devices for Pelvic Surgery as High Risk Class III

Sep 1st, 2011 | By
LATEST FDA REPORT: Classify Surgical Mesh Devices for Pelvic Surgery as High Risk Class III

AUGUST 31, 2011 /If a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff report is adopted, synthetic surgical mesh manufacturers such as Boston Scientific Corp., Johnson & Johnson, American Medical Systems and six other makers of  mesh used for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair may be forced to submit safety data to keep their products on
[continue reading...]



How to Post an Adverse Event with the FDA

Aug 30th, 2011 | By
How to Post an Adverse Event with the FDA

When you have a new car that develops a “safety” issue i.e. braking, steering, airbags, wiring, engine cooling, unintended acceleration etc, the auto dealer reports the problems to the manufacturer, who by law, must report the issue to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration within five days. But when a patient has a problem with
[continue reading...]



Gateway FDA: The New 510 (k) Guidance: A Product Liability Perspective, Gateway FDA, August 26, 2011

Aug 26th, 2011 | By

This August 26, 2011 blog on Gateway FDA is written for the medical device industry and its lawyers. The FDA recently issued new draft guidelines so manufacturers understand how to comply with the controversial 510(k) fast-track approval for marketing of their medical device. The new guidelines replace the 1997 guidelines for 510(k) submission. Included is
[continue reading...]



Changes Are Afoot in U.S. Medical Device Regulations, Morningstar, August 15, 2011

Aug 15th, 2011 | By

This excellent article by Morningstar reminds us that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been reviewing the regulatory process that allows most medical devices to make their way into the marketplace and the agency plans to have new changes in place by October. This is sparked by the July release of the Institute of
[continue reading...]



U.S. Advisers Call for New Medical Device Regime, Reuters July 29, 2011

Aug 14th, 2011 | By
U.S. Advisers Call for New Medical Device Regime, Reuters July 29, 2011

The FDA is pushing back on an Institute of Medicine recommendation that the fast-track approval process for medical devices is fatally flawed and should be replaced, reports Reuters. FDA’s Jeffrey Shuren, director of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, which oversees devices, said the 510(k) process should not be eliminated, but “we are open
[continue reading...]



We hope you find this a helpful resource. National News Editor, Jane Akre, began MDND with the hope of providing the latest news, information and perspective from the regulatory, industry and patient point of view, something that goes under-reported in much of the coverage of medical devices. The public is just now becoming aware that many devices do not undergo the same scrutiny as prescription drugs and are instead grandfathered in under an FDA loophole that has gone largely unchanged since the 1970s. As a result, patients become the post-market clinical trial subjects, and many suffer devastating and permanent injuries.