FDA

Mesh Survivors UK- Contact Your GP, MP – Challenge the Information!

Oct 10th, 2014 | By
Mesh Survivors UK- Contact Your GP, MP – Challenge the Information!

A mesh survivor from the UK suggests survivors contact their GP and MP with their mesh survivor stories.  (GP is general practitioner and MP is Member of Parliament. The reason – no one ever gets a letter to confirm it has been reported. Finally, this writer got a report to confirm. It said:  this event
[continue reading...]



FDA Must Reclassify Synthetic Mesh Now!

Oct 1st, 2014 | By

October 2, 2014   Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D. Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services   Jeffrey E. Shuren, M.D., J.D. Director, Center for Devices and Radiologic Health Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services   Dear Drs. Hamburg and Shuren, We, the supporters and members of the
[continue reading...]



Thank You All for Telling the FDA to Reclassify!!

Jul 31st, 2014 | By
Thank You All for Telling the FDA to Reclassify!!

Thank you,,, thank you…. thank you! I talked to the FDA today  and they say that it could take many months for individuals within the FDA to read all of the comments made to a Petition to reclassify pelvic mesh as High Risk!    Some of you may have posted that you wanted to be private
[continue reading...]



Speak to the FDA Now!

Jul 28th, 2014 | By
Speak to the FDA Now!

  Midnight Wednesday July 30, the opportunity ends to weigh into the FDA concerning the reclassification of POP mesh to class III or a high-risk device which it certainly is. Mesh will never survive that scrutiny. Mesh News Desk and Corporate Action Network, a consumer group, are asking you to share the link below with
[continue reading...]



New* Fridays with the FDA: One Lovely Lady’s Plea

Jun 27th, 2014 | By

A lovely woman called me this afternoon. Her suggestion for a Friday effort and beyond!! She can’t be identified but she says: “The FDA is giving us an opportunity to speak and get mesh reclassified so  more women will be less likely to innocently have it done to them. Doctors would be forced to give
[continue reading...]



FDA: *IMPORTANT* How To Weigh in on Reclassifying Pelvic Mesh To High-Risk!

Apr 29th, 2014 | By
FDA: *IMPORTANT* How To Weigh in on Reclassifying Pelvic Mesh To High-Risk!

*NEW*  Readers of Mesh News Desk understand that the Food and Drug Administration has allowed  the polypropylene-based material onto the market to treat pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence with very little scrutiny.  In fact, the 510(k) approval process is an approval to sell, and does not require safety and efficacy assurances. Now the agency is
[continue reading...]



Harvard Researchers Take FDA’s Device Approvals to Task

Apr 2nd, 2014 | By
Harvard Researchers Take FDA’s Device Approvals to Task

Using documents that recently came to light, Harvard researchers have traced a troubling approval process within the Food and Drug Administration that allows medical devices to be sold with little oversight. Essentially the supplemental application resembles the agency’s 510(k) process that allows medical devices to be marketed without clinical trials. The paper is reported in
[continue reading...]



FDA Approves New American Medical System Transvaginal Mesh Sling

Dec 9th, 2013 | By
FDA Approves New American Medical System Transvaginal Mesh Sling

American Medical Systems (AMS) has just received FDA clearance to market a new incontinence sling, according to a press release that appears in the Wall Street Journal. The RetroArc Retropubic Sling System received the Food the Drug Administration’s 510(k) clearance, a standard that does not require any clinical trials but relies on naming a similar 
[continue reading...]



FDA Steps Up Medical Device Monitoring – It’s About Time

Sep 24th, 2013 | By
FDA Steps Up Medical Device Monitoring – It’s About Time

Could the entire mesh mesh have been averted much sooner before perhaps one million women were implanted with controversial transvaginal mesh? Yes, if the U.S. tracked medical devices the way it’s done elsewhere. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is finally taking a step in that direction. The FDA has just announced a final rule
[continue reading...]



Happy Anniversary Food and Drug Administration – Now What?

Jul 2nd, 2013 | By
Happy Anniversary Food and Drug Administration – Now What?

July 2, 2013 ~ Many of you may be aware that the entire pursuit of lawsuits against mesh manufacturers began two years ago this month with the issuance of a safety warning from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration concerning transvaginal mesh. FDA Safety Communication: UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical
[continue reading...]



We hope you find this a helpful resource. National News Editor, Jane Akre, began MDND with the hope of providing the latest news, information and perspective from the regulatory, industry and patient point of view, something that goes under-reported in much of the coverage of medical devices. The public is just now becoming aware that many devices do not undergo the same scrutiny as prescription drugs and are instead grandfathered in under an FDA loophole that has gone largely unchanged since the 1970s. As a result, patients become the post-market clinical trial subjects, and many suffer devastating and permanent injuries.